' To speak, for example, in democracy and to silence the people are a humbug, speech in humanismo and to deny the men is one mentira' '. (Pablo Freire, 94p, 2005). The professor is one of the basic authors in the moral and social formation of educating, guiding in the possible measure do the pupil in some aspects of its life. Horace Mann understood the implications. The educator not only guides in regards to disciplines that he is giving, as well as to create debates on the same ones, of form to argue, gradual, the current subjects with the pupils on what he occurs in the society. *Educadora, Pedagoga, Permitted in History, After graduated History of the Culture Afro-Brazilian, Mestrando in Sciences of the Education. Mail:. The present ethnic-cultural diversity daily in the Brazilian context, expressing itself in music, the dance, the culinria, our Portuguese language and between innumerable activities in our daily one.

What if it makes necessary to remember, is that to deal with these questions is necessary to go beyond the constatao, of contemplation and of the folclorizao that many times if makes around the existing differences. The educative process emanated by the education is something that the society cannot do without. In contrast, the education is basic in the process of learning and the necessary understanding so that if it can see ' ' diferente' ' in its complexities of forms of relations human beings and its affirmations and significaes/ressignificaes. The existing relations in the construction process and significao of the differences in the society very need well to be understood. The necessary valuation of the difference that we search if of the one in the direction to positively recognize and to affirm the plurality and the singularity of each different culture and not the acceptance of the inaqualities, many times, justified equivocadamente for racial the cultural difference/and that they result in the internalization of the human beings.

But, however they do not take off its value as educational tool. – Maturity – In 12 executions of software no serious imperfection was observed; the maturity if extends some tools that do not present any type of error or inconvenience, when being set in motion, them answers its objectives accurately. For more information see Natural Power. – Tolerance the imperfections software is passive in relation to the treatment of imperfections. – Recuperabilidade During the imperfections in the system as an energy fall or the applicatory one to be closed for accident, can be noticed that the not safe Gcompris the information during the processing of the game and recoups so little them, it to the executed being and later interrupted, the user will have that to initiate it again. 3.1.3 How much to the usability the Gcompris displays an interface sufficiently intuitiva and practical, it brings support about 60 languages including the Brazil Portuguese for interaction between user and software.

Beyond the written menus to be all in Portuguese, the narration of the games and exercises also is made in our language. Although to be told in Portuguese of Portugal, it is very easy of being understood by who is using. The adaptations in the effect, the size of the screen, music and the time of execution of the activities are offered in the configuration menu, being able to be modified at any time. – Inteligibilidade – the agreement on the functionality of the Gcompris is in the understanding on the grouping of the activities proposals, the icons and its perception, the buttons and the names attributed to the windows are representative. The interface of the Gcompris is composed of a main menu. To the left, the main sessions are all, each icon represent an activity. When mouse of locates on it, the activity, the icon and the objective of the activity appears in the viewfinder.

The Desconstruo of the modern citizen Inaugurador of a new was Metaphysical, the philosopher in the truth advanced more, helping to convert this idea into principle of moral behavior that, today, is desired to reduce to the technological injunction, when claiming, has one hundred years more than, that, ' ' although it is a necessary start, it is not only enough to be to be an only man: this would be to exortar to restrict you it you. We must pass of a diverse individuality to others and to live deeply the existence of a multitude of beings! ' ' (VP 1935, P. 389). The convergence of this idea with some teses of the main theoreticians of the cibercultura is notable, given that, according to same we recentssimos, them progressos technological verified with the appearance of the generating machines of virtual reality (simulation) and the telemticas nets of interaction try the creation of a responsible culture for the erosion of the modern subjectivity. ' ' In this scope the old dualismos and the safe borders that characterized ideologically our cultural tradition is ranks in check. Radical separations as I-other, body-mind, creator-creature, truth-illusion, Real-unreal, among others – they are not more so clear and operational in the world of the relation man-mquina.' ' For the spokesmen of the thesis, the communication technologies would be, really and in special, promoting a multiplication of contacts knowledge whose resulted main, socially speaking, it is the gradual change in the effective conceptions on as if structure and functions ours I. The development of mechanisms of virtual interaction would be exceeding the opposition between sender and receiver, making us using interagentes of open nets and without center, in which ' ' the unstabler, multiple citizens if become each time and difusos' '. Through the machine, we start to live situations where not only cited I became multiple, fluid and opened but, moreover, he is having a rupture of the beginning of identity.

Of the opposite, it can constitute an interesting possibility of education and learning. What if it is questioning is a theoretical position that of a reference, the form of guiding, position that a fragmented and circular space considers, which if extends successively. Leaving of ' ' eu' ' , of the family, is created an anthropocentric proposal? or better, self-centered? around of ' ' eu' '. The problem is not to leave of ' ' eu' ' , but yes to break up the spaces that if succeed and that they pass to be considered separately, as if everything was justified in that one and for that same place. The dynamics of the world is given by other factors. the challenge is to understand ' ' eu' ' in the world, considering its current complexity. The theoretical reference is searched in such a way in geography? which considers that the space socially is constructed by the work and the forms of life of the men? how in the Pedagogia? which considers that the learning is social and happens in the interlocution of the citizens (is they gifts physically, occupying a next space, are distant they, keeping virtual contacts, or under the hegemony of determined conduction politics, economic). How to surpass the positivismo of geography and the education, in a world that is changed and aceleradamente continues moving? What it would be possible to make to produce a new form of ' ' to teach mundo' '? If the studies of the way, considered from the beginning of the concentrical circles, if do not show appropriate to make the reading of the space? what would have to contain the possibility to perceive the movement, to perceive the cotidianidade of the life of some citizens and its expression by means of the groups of that they participate, constructing its space? which the possible alternatives? Which the theoretical referenciais that would allow in to construct them methods of analysis of the geographic space capable to allow that the pupils recognize themselves in the interior of this space? that if feels producing this space effectively? E, in this direction, which the practical ones social (in special the pertaining to school) that they would be presented as efficient? The PEDAGOGICAL E/EM GEOGRAPHY to breach with practical the traditional one of the classroom, does not advance only the will of the professor.